Branch: "You're fired."
Southerlyn: "Is this because I'm a lesbian?"
America: "WHAT???!!!!"
[mp3]
Many fans have waited a long time for Serena's departure, but I don't think anyone expected it to go quite like this. The moment was shocking, but, after even slight reflection, seems incredibly cheap and hollow. Subtlety has been lacking from the show's scripts for the last several years, and this is, certainly, the most ham-fisted bit of writing I've seen yet.
Contrast it with way the departures of other characters have been handled: often with some "organic" dramatic build-up, and always with integrity -- Cerreta and Greevey getting shot, Curtis leaving to take care of his wife, Ross's session with the disciplinary committee, and of course Kincaid's getting killed in an already emotional episode.
Southerlyn's departing moments break with that tradition of narrative integrity and substitute shock value instead. What else could the writers have been hoping to achieve with this one? It's not like there has been rampant speculation about Serena's sexuality that has finally been "paid off" by this revelation. It's not to achieve any kind of political end, since the character is gone now and can't serve as an example or whatever. Although Serena's self-outing had some possible subtextual precedence in an earlier episode ("Guv Luv," the McGreevey one), it seems the only goal was to surprise the audience and get people talking about the show again. Quite a deviation from the show's usual "procedural" story-telling technique.
If this is where they eventually wanted to take things, the writers would have been better served had they established some indicators of Serena's sexuality earlier in the series. If that was part of her backstory, they could have worked it in a lot better than they did, shoe-horning the admission into her closing moments on the show. Also, I had a dim recollection of a previous episode in which she flirts heavily with a man she was working with. (A reader's comment below helped me find that episode.) The writers have written inconsistencies into the show before, but this one comes at such a crucial moment, it's especially disappointing.
The thing that it reminded me of more than anything else is that moment in the last Presidential debate when John Kerry went out of his way to remind everyone that Dick Cheney's daughter is a lesbian. It made no sense for him to bring it up, but he did anyway, essentially because of the shock value. I wonder if this part of the script was being written around the time that happened, and the writers were subconsciously influenced by it.
Oh well. At least she's gone.
So let's get to a summary of the actual plot of the episode (15.13), which bears some resemblance to the real-life case of Jam Master Jay's murder.
The episode begins at a red carpet event in Times Square, where it appears well-to-do types are arriving for an awards ceremony or movie premiere. Some characters are looking for someone, and one says something like, "He's going to miss his award." One of these people goes to look for the missing person at "the studio."
Cut to the recording studio, where the victim, a youngish black man, is found on the floor, shot to death, with a red plume of blood covering his chest.
Police, including Dets. Fontana and Green arrive. CSU brings up an empty plastic soda bottle that has been burned by gun powder. Fontana and Green immediately recognize this as "ghetto silencer." Apparently soda bottles can be taped to the barrels of handguns to dampen their noise. The victim is idenfied as Ronald Caldwell, ak "RC Flex," a well-know hip-hop DJ and producer who, Green says, has been involved in hip-hop since the early days and has had some success as a cross-over artist, too. Fontana is predictably clueless about recent hip-hop rivalries and so on.
They visit Caldwell's wife at their luxury apartment. The CEO of Caldwell's record label is there, too. Mrs Caldwell saays that Pete Andretti, Caldwell's bodyguard, would have been protecting him earlier that night at a talent showcase at a club. They visit Andretti's office, and meet his wife/receptionist, CC, who expresses noticeable dismay at the news of RC's death, although she says she didn't know him well. Hmm. Andretti (played by Soprano's veteran Al Sapienza) enters, and says he was with RC at the club but noticed nothing amiss. He has a .45, the same kind of gun as the murder weapon. He's also an ex-cop.
They go to the Groove Club, where the showcase took place, and a staff member tells them that Andretti was not with RC that night. She says another man, "Mooney," was serving as the bodyguard. Andretti lied to them. They talk to Mooney, who also happens to be a cop, and then they talk to Andretti's former partner, who says Andretti had gotten into trouble for moonlighting as a bodyguard while still on active duty. Andretti had also gotten in the middle of a hip-hop dispute during this time, and had fired shots with his service weapon in that context.
Mooney tells them that there was also a recent dispute between Andretti and RC, possibly having to do with RC's relationship with Andretti's wife, the receptionist. There's a motive, a lie, and a weapon.
Fontana and Green question Andretti at the precinct, but don't really get anywhere, despite his extremely weak alibi. He doesn't offer much of an excuse for lying to them, so we're pretty much left to assume that he did so because he was trying to hide the dispute from the detectives, a choice which has since backfired.
They talk to ME Rodgers who examines the body and tells them that there are compression wounds on RC's chest, indicating someone else was in the studio at the time of the murder and tried to resuscitate him after he was shot.
They talk to annoying omni-forensics guy Beck, who, in a bit of terrible writing that anticipates the crap to come later in the episode, mentions TWICE how much he likes gangsta rap, which he calls "gangster" rap. Ugh. Anyway, Beck's big contribution is that he gives them a demo CD containing three tracks that was taken from the crime scene. They take the CD to the record label exec, and he identifies the performer on it as a teenager named Stephen "Four Strike" Foreman. But the track is a remix of one that was intended to appear on Four Strike's forthcoming album, which suggests that Foreman was creating bootlegs of his own album material so he could sell them on the street and keep 100% of the profits. The dets theorize RC got in the way of this, and so Foreman killed him.
They visit Stephen's home in Hollis, Queens (where Run-DMC is from, by the way), talking briefly to his middle-class parents, and then find Stephen in his garage/studio playing video games with his friend. They are surrounded by expensive audio equipment. The dets tell his friend to take a hike, and Foreman denies any bootlegging or involvement in the murder, although his story is inconsistent with previous details.
Green and Fontana listen to the CD in Fontana's expensive Mercedes, and Green notes a lyric describing a murder that happened in 2003. Foreman appears to be confessing to the unsolved case on the track. They talk to the detective who originally handled the case, and learn that the prime suspect was a kid named Anthony Harrison who goes by the name "Psycho." Psycho, it turns out, is the kid who was playing video games with Foreman in the garage!
They revisit Foreman's garage, this time with a search warrant, and find boxes full of bootleg CDs, as well as a boot with gunpowder burned into it. They arrest Foreman.
McCoy meets with Foreman and his lawyer at Rikers, but doesn't get anywhere. At arraignment with Judge Feist, he pleads not guilty and immediately puts up $2 million in bail money.
Southerlyn and McCoy have a brief conversation about the importance of reputations in the rap industry. Southerlyn vists Foreman's parents, hoping to convince them to persuade their son to cooperate with the investigation, since SS seems to think Foreman is not guilty. The parents are in denial.
In the episode's second-most ludicrous scene, SS tells Jack about some stuff she found on a website called "hiphopnations.com" (nothing there -- i checked). She was going through the chat rooms or bulletin boards and finds a message written in hip-hop-ese, which she then reads to Jack, affecting the slightest gangsta-accent. Oh it is truly terrible and laughable [mp3]. Regardless, the message says that Harrison ("Psycho") is claiming to be responsible for RC's murder.
McCoy and SS visit the record label, "Detention Records," and seek the email address of the user ("New G") who left this message. At first the label's executives seem like they're co-operative, but then they demand a subpoena, which they then fight. McCoy wins the right to have the email address turned over to them, and the judge also demands that the indentity of the user be turned over to them. The label's lawyer satisfies that request, announcing that the user is "Anatoli" something-or-other, and he lives in Ukraine. Oh well. Cross one lead off the list.
SS confronts Foreman and tries to persuade him to admit the truth, or what she believes is the truth: that Harrison, not Foreman, killed RC, and Harrison is the one who tried to resuscitate him. Foreman gets all pouty, and says he's just trying to protect himself, and Southerlyn spouts off this classic line: "This was a war for your soul, wasn't it?" God. Who writes this garbage?
They confer with Branch, who tells them to try the case against Foreman, which they do.
At trial (42'), Fontana testifies, and Harrison enters the courtroom, looking suspicious. I was hoping he had smuggled a gun into the room and was going to shoot Serena, but that's not how it played out, unfortunately. Instead, Harrison eventually whispers to Foreman's lawyer that he wants to testify and confess to the killing of RC.
This causes a big debate in chambers, because McCoy is worried this is going to scuttle his case against Foreman. He asks for and receives a continuance of 72 hours to investigate.
McCoy learns that Foreman withdrew $500,000 of his advance money from the bank and apparently gave that money to Harrison in exchange for his testimony.
They call in Foreman to talk it over. He tells the story: Before the murder, Harrison wanted to use Foreman's money to buy, and then re-sell for a profit, a large quantity of drugs. Foreman was going to go along with the plan, but then RC talked him out of it. Harrison therefore saw RC as an obstacle, and murdered him. Foreman just happened to be at the studio when this occurred, and even buzzed Harrison in through the building's doors.
Afterwards, Branch and the ADAs talk it over. Southerlyn is reluctant to proceed on the case. Branch asks her what she wants the group to do, and she says something like, "What difference does it make? Every time I express an opinion around here the last few months, I get shot down." I wish that were literally true.
They debate with the trial judge whether to proceed with the trial and/or let Harrison testify. McCoy agrees to allow Harrison testify, which he does. He confesses to RC's murder. McCoy gives him a hard time on cross-examination, apparently trying to reduce the witness's credibility.
Fontana and Green arrest Harrison for the 2003 murder as he leaves the courtroom.
The verdict comes back for Foreman: Not Guilty! McCoy lost, but he immediately asks that Foreman be arrested for witness tampering.
In the aftermath, Branch calls Serena into his office, and we know what's coming. He tells her she may have been right about Foreman, but she was "right for the wrong reasons." She allowed her emotions, not evidence, to dictate her thinking, he says, and this approach is more suitable (he says) for defense attorneys. As foolish as this is, especially given the number of times that McCoy has followed hunches, passions, and emotions over the years, he stands by it. Southerlyn looks a bit perplexed until she realizes where all this is headed.
He fires her, and she asks her crazy question, and he replies, "No. No, of course not." And she says, apparently convinced, "Good....good." Roll credits!
Does anyone else suspect that the episode's title -- "Ain't No Love" -- is an acknowledgment of the audience's distaste for Serena, and an explanation for her departure?
Related: Ain't No Love by Whitesnake (lyrics)
Related: Ain't No Love by Jay-Z (lyrics)
Posted by adm at January 13, 2005 12:02 AM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.thousandrobots.com/mt/mt-tb.cgi/785
your site is the only one i can find with information regarding this lesbian issue. i watch l&o when i can so i thought i missed something. i guess you're as surprised as i was.
Posted by: Dave at January 13, 2005 01:30 AM
THANK YOU. I was literally screaming at the TV "she's a lesbian? What?!?" Totally unnecessary and right out of the blue? Besides, I clearly remember an episode back in season 14 (?) where her character and an FBI undercover agent for the mob were flirting and it seemed to me that there was a strong attraction between them.
Oh well. As you say, the important thing is, she's gone. I love how she got fired, too!
Posted by: Celia at January 13, 2005 06:09 AM
I too was surpised, not really by the content, but just the sheer pointlessness and tackiness of it. It felt obviously contrived, as though her character was never really conceived of as being a lesbian, but then for the finale they thought they'd throw it in for some oohs and aahs. And her reading-off-a-cue-card delivery that much further shattered any suspension of disbelief I'd managed to assume.
But that wasn't the only ridiculous moment -- I was just recovering when the lesbian business hit me, a one-two sucker punch. The first dumb line was Branch's saying "You're fired." So lame! There's no way he would have said that pre-Apprentice. Most any boss who had the respect for her that Branch claimed to would have said "I'm letting you go" or something similar. For L&O to invoke a show like the Apprentice for no particular reason brings the whole episode crashing to the floor. So I was just reacting to that and then we get "Is this because I'm a lesbian?" At which point I just had to laugh.
On a lesser note, the whole buildup to her getting fired begged credibility -- she appeared so ridiculously irrational and unprofessional that it would be hard to imagine her even having the job. On the other hand, I was psyched that she actually WAS fired, because unlike those which preceded her, she really was the only bad actor the show has ever had. (I didn't like Dianne Weist, and Dennis Farina doesn't appeal to me, but at least they didn't/don't snap me out of the show's reality every time they open their mouth.)
Perhaps in a less "realistic" show this finale wouldn't have seemed so absurd, but Law & Order succeeds by creating a very believable world (usually). But man, not last night. My girlfriend put it best when she said, "This is like a fake Law & Order."
Posted by: Ivan at January 13, 2005 03:47 PM
I loved it. I'm sorry. I thought it was Dick Wolf reminding everyone that he writes his stories/shows about the story and not the character. The whole, "Is this because I'm a lesbian?" just proved how little we knew about Serena and was perfect. No other ADA has ever been fired as well, which made it even better. I'm sorry, I wasn't a big Serena fan and wrote it up the second the show was over on my site and have spent hours arguing this on various sites.
Serena will always be remember as the first ADA fired and as the lesbian shocker. Brilliant. I loved it as the twist that got even hardcore fans like myself who have been there from the pilot with William H. Macy as the DA.
Dick Wolf did a great job of throwing in the twist that has been missing from the L&O original series lately and reminding us that the series he created is supposed to be about the story and not the characters.
Posted by: Mandy at January 13, 2005 03:48 PM
The lesbian comment was completely out of the blue and had no significance to the plot at all. On the other hand, John Kerry was asked a specific question about gay marriage and used the opportunity to point out the hipocricy of Cheney supporting an initiative to curb his own daughter's basic human rights.
Posted by: Phil at January 13, 2005 04:44 PM
As much as I tried to like her, I'm glad to see Serena gone. She was never New York enough for the show, in my view.
Branch saying that it was his decision no matter what McCoy thinks is noteworthy. Was Branch intimating McCoy wanted to keep her around? If not, it raises the question, did McCoy put a bug in Branch's ear about getting rid of her? If so, why?
Has it occurred to anyone else that McCoy may have had designs on sleeping with her at one time? By all appearances he didn't treat her any different than the prior female ADAs. But, say McCoy tried to get her into the sack and she rebuffed his advances with something like, "I'm gay!" Is it possible that Jack is just homophobe enough to not even want to work so close with a lesbian, and the whole, "you're a better advocate than a prosecutor" by Branch thing was really just a ruse to protect himself, McCoy and the office from a major discrimination suit?
Well, we'll probably never know. Although, it is the middle of the season which leaves time enough for a mention or two in future episodes.
In any event, it removed McCoy totally from the firing process. And, of course, we'll never see what kind of goodbye Serena and Jack had.
One thing I thought was deceptive on NBC's part, in the tease commercials leading up to last night's show, I could swear NBC was saying something about a "special send-off" for Serena. To me a special send-off is a going away party with co-workers, cards, punch, and cake. Whatever they said, it sure made me remember to watch the show, which is something considering I've missed more than half of the current season.
Posted by: Marie at January 14, 2005 12:52 AM
Thank you. We, too, were screaming "What?!?" and our phone immediately rang with friends and relatives--also dedicated L&O fans--asking the same questions: should we have known this already?
It was a cheap ploy, dropping it in like that at the end for no reason. It could have been interesting if they'd brought it up earlier, especially with her working for a womanizer like McCoy and a conservative like Branch. They missed the boat.
And, when Branch said she wasn't fired b/c she's a lesbian, and she said, "Good...good." I don't think she was convinced...I think she was saying, "I can't prove it, but I'm onto you, old man."
Posted by: t at January 15, 2005 10:08 PM
I've never understood why so many fans were so down on Elizabeth Rohm. I thought Richard Brooks' blank stare style of acting was horrific, and as much fun as Jill Hennessey is on "Crossing Jordan," I thought she was just that bad on L&O. Rohm's performances didn't come close to making me long for either one of those characters' returns.
As for the lesbian comment, it was just silly. Setting aside how one might feel about the actor, the character was smart enough to have heard what Brach said leading up to the firing, probably agreed with his observations, and might reasonably have been thinking of a career change already. It was thrown in for shock value and nothing more.
I did have one thought, tho (you Rohm "fans" will love this): maybe Serena will be back to sue the department.
Posted by: Jackie at January 20, 2005 12:33 PM
Seriously thought that the end scene was all a joke. The lesbian thing had me going, WTF? What did I miss? Apparently nothing much.
Posted by: Sleeper at May 11, 2005 02:05 AM
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)